Blog — Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
For years the FBI operated a secret drone program that only came to light in June 2013, during then-FBI Director Robert Mueller’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Since this revelation, the FBI has attempted repeatedly to downplay both the size and significance of its drone program, insisting drones are merely one of the law enforcement tools the FBI has used sparingly in missions related to kidnappings, search and rescue operations, drug interdictions, and fugitive investigations.
Curious to know more about the broad outlines of the FBI’s drone program, including the source of and funding for its drones, who has provided the FBI with drone training, and any FBI policy on drone use, CREW filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the agency. Predictably the FBI stonewalled, forcing CREW to sue the agency for information. Eventually, in response to court orders, the FBI processed 6,720 non-duplicative pages of documents, releasing only 1,970 – most of which contained extensive redactions – and withholding the rest as exempt in their entirety under FOIA Exemptions 1 (classified information), Exemption 3 (information protected by the National Security Act), Exemption 4 (solicitation-related material submitted to the FBI by vendors supplying drones as well as operator manuals and vendor training documents), Exemption 5 (claimed deliberative material), and Exemption 7(E) (non-public investigative techniques). The FBI then moved for summary judgment, relying on a sworn declaration of an FBI official to claim it had produced everything required.
There is a lot to criticize in the FBI’s motion and CREW was scathing in its response, but most outrageously, the FBI relied heavily on Exemptions 1 and 3, under which information may be withheld to protect intelligence sources or methods pertaining to foreign activities of the United States. So how exactly do records regarding the use of drones by domestic law enforcement implicate the foreign activities of the United States? How would information pertaining to the FBI’s source and funding of drones, its drone training, and policies reveal anything about U.S. foreign intelligence activities “in or about a foreign country,” we asked.
There are two possibilities. Either the FBI has lied to both the public and Congress about the scope of its drone program as narrow and limited to domestic use, or the FBI’s declaration failed to accurately reflect the true impact disclosure of the requested information would have. In either case, the FBI’s reflexive and unjustified non-disclosure violates the fundamental precepts of the FOIA: letting the public know what our government is up to. Instead, the FBI is trying to shroud its drone program in secrecy to prevent the public from understanding its contours and whether and how it comports with the law.
CREW will keep asking the hard questions of the government with the goal of assuaging concerns about this program, or sound the alarm on an agency run amok. What we categorically will not do, however, is settle for the sleight of hand the FBI has attempted here.
More Blog Posts
Like previous documents handed over to CREW, these provide little insight into the FBI’s drone program because much of the information either is already publicly available or is heavily redacted.
Read More ›
More documents from the FBI about domestic drone use raises more questions. Read More ›
While this verdict clears up what happened on the state level, it leaves unresolved why the Department of Justice refused to prosecute Gov. Deal. Read More ›
April 9, 2014 | Congress, Corruption, Elections, Ethics, Office of Congressional Ethics, Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), FOIA, House, Most Corrupt, Republicans, States, Georgia, Worst Governors, Governors, Nathan Deal
Docs delivered to CREW cast serious doubts on the Bureau's assertions about the domestic use of drone. Read More ›
March 24, 2014 | Congress, Federal Agencies, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), FOIA, Legal, FOIA Requests, Transparency, House Members, Ted Poe, Zoe Lofgren, Senate Members, Rand Paul, CREW v. Department of Justice (FBI's use of drones)
The list of district court judges unhappy with how the Department of Justice is processing CREW’s FOIA requests kept growing last week. Read More ›
February 18, 2014 | Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), FOIA, Legal, FOIA Requests, Senate, States, Nevada, Transparency, Senate Members, John Ensign, CREW v. Department of Justice (Ensign Investigation)
Citing “the intense interest in the public’s concern about the FBI’s use of drones to conduct domestic surveillance," the district court sides with CREW. Read More ›