Blog — Department of Justice
In a recent letter to the editor in BloombergView, Cass Sunstein explained his opposition to a key provision of the groundbreaking Freedom of Information Act legislation recently proposed by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Mr. Sunstein’s position should come as no surprise to those familiar with his work as head of OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Under his leadership, the regulatory clearinghouse was shrouded in secrecy and became the place where controversial regulations went to die, with little or no public accountability.
Even more noteworthy, Mr. Sunstein’s remarks are out of step with the administration in which he served. President Obama began his first term with a pledge to be the most transparent administration in history. Attorney General Holder followed up several months later with a policy directive that made disclosure the default under the FOIA, especially when it comes to internal government deliberations. Agencies were directed to invoke Exemption 5, which protects internal government deliberations, sparingly. If anything, the proposed legislation codifies what already should be agency practice.
Nor is allowing the public to pierce the veil of privacy that surrounds government deliberations a new concept outside of the FOIA context. In discovery, litigants may overcome the government’s assertion of the deliberative process privilege with a showing of need, the same showing now incorporated into the FOIA bill. As all this makes clear, agency officials have never operated with a reasonable expectation all of their deliberations would remain secret forever.
The public already has been deprived of vital information under the guise of protecting internal agency discussions, from the so-called “torture memos” authored by the Office of Legal Counsel to the rationale behind the targeted killing of American citizens on foreign soil. Senators Leahy and Cornyn, the co-sponsors of the FOIA bill, wisely recognize that a true democracy — one of which James Madison would approve — must balance the competing interests of a government’s claimed need for secrecy and the public’s right to know. That is all the FOIA bill does.
More Blog Posts
Starting in 2010, the White House required some agencies to create biannual open government plans. We're tracking compliance. Read More ›
July 8, 2014 | Federal Agencies, Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Labor, Department of State, Department of the Treasury, Department of Transportation, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Science and Technology Policy, Transparency, Daniel Schuman, Open Government
With the Department of Justice, the Federal Election Commission, and the House Ethics Committee failing again and again to punish official wrongdoing, what do pols have to lose? Read More ›
July 8, 2014 | Congress, Corruption, Ethics, Congressional Ethics, House Ethics Committee, Office of Congressional Ethics, Senate Ethics Committee, Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Election Commission (FEC), Legal, House Ethics, Most Corrupt, Under Investigation, House Members, Don Young, Robert Andrews
As reforms to the Freedom of Information Act make their way through Washington, we thought it valuable to examine the financial side of FOIA. Read More ›
Putting the Senate's bill on a fast track, avoids substantive consideration and amendments by the full House of Representatives. Read More ›
As part of the biannual process by which agencies create open government plans, CREW submitted recommendations to the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Justice Read More ›
May 20, 2014 | Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Governance & Legislation, The White House, Transparency, Daniel Schuman, Open Government, open government directive, White Paper
While this verdict clears up what happened on the state level, it leaves unresolved why the Department of Justice refused to prosecute Gov. Deal. Read More ›
April 9, 2014 | Congress, Corruption, Elections, Ethics, Office of Congressional Ethics, Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), FOIA, House, Most Corrupt, Republicans, States, Georgia, Worst Governors, Governors, Nathan Deal