Blog — Department of Justice
Thanks to a federal judge’s ruling, and a stubborn Department of Justice, CREW is in line to cash a big check.
On Monday U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled that DOJ must reimburse us more than $70,000 in legal attorney fees accumulated during our court fight to reveal documents relating to the failed corruption probe of Rep. Don Young (R-AK).
In January of 2011 we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to find out why the DOJ’s Criminal Division never brought charges against the congressman, despite ample evidence of wrongdoing. The government steadfastly refused to release those documents, citing “privacy concerns.” So we filed suit.
The Legal Times explains the rest:
U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled against the government. Young’s privacy interests were “much diminished” because information about the investigation was already public, the judge said. She also found that the government failed to make specific enough arguments for exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act.
In her ruling, Judge Kessler cited public interest in the documents and labeled the government’s decision “unreasonable.”
"It should be noted that in its opening brief on the merits, DoJ took the position that there was no public interest in the requested records," Kessler wrote on Monday. The government's stance in the FOIA case, the judge said, was "particularly hard to take seriously" given the prominence of Young's service in the House.
Additionally, the judge labeled the DOJ’s attempts to challenge our request for fees nit-picking and a waste of time. While we expect the Justice Department to appeal the ruling, we certainly feel a sense of vindication.
More Blog Posts
If anything, proposed legislation to strengthen FOIA codifies what already should be agency practice. Read More ›
July 14, 2014 | Congress, Democrats, Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FOIA, Governance & Legislation, News, Bloomberg, Republicans, The White House, Transparency, Eric Holder, President Barack Obama
Starting in 2010, the White House required some agencies to create biannual open government plans. We're tracking compliance. Read More ›
July 8, 2014 | Federal Agencies, Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Labor, Department of State, Department of the Treasury, Department of Transportation, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Science and Technology Policy, Transparency, Daniel Schuman, Open Government
With the Department of Justice, the Federal Election Commission, and the House Ethics Committee failing again and again to punish official wrongdoing, what do pols have to lose? Read More ›
July 8, 2014 | Congress, Corruption, Ethics, Congressional Ethics, House Ethics Committee, Office of Congressional Ethics, Senate Ethics Committee, Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Election Commission (FEC), Legal, House Ethics, Most Corrupt, Under Investigation, House Members, Don Young, Robert Andrews
As reforms to the Freedom of Information Act make their way through Washington, we thought it valuable to examine the financial side of FOIA. Read More ›
Putting the Senate's bill on a fast track, avoids substantive consideration and amendments by the full House of Representatives. Read More ›
As part of the biannual process by which agencies create open government plans, CREW submitted recommendations to the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Justice Read More ›
May 20, 2014 | Federal Agencies, Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Governance & Legislation, The White House, Transparency, Daniel Schuman, Open Government, open government directive, White Paper